top of page

Oral NAD or IV NAD, which one is better ?


Oral vs. Intravenous NAD Administration: Weighing the Options When it comes to administering Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide (NAD), the choice between oral and intravenous (IV) administration is a critical one. Both methods have their advantages and considerations, and understanding these differences is essential for making an informed decision.


Oral NAD Supplementation: Oral NAD supplements are widely available and offer the convenience of self-administration. However, it's important to note that NAD is sensitive to light, moisture, temperature, and pH, which can affect its stability in capsule form. To address this, some oral supplements contain NAD precursors like nicotinamide (NAM) and nicotinic acid (NA). These precursors require enzymatic steps to be converted into NAD and may become bioavailable more slowly.


Research on Oral NAD: Numerous studies have explored the effectiveness of oral NAD precursors. Research findings suggest that oral supplementation can increase NAD levels in various tissues. However, the conversion process from precursors to NAD may be slower, and the stability of NAD in oral supplements can be a concern.


Intravenous NAD Administration: IV NAD infusion provides a more direct and immediate source of NAD to the body. By bypassing the need for NAD precursors, IV administration offers a rapid increase in NAD levels.


Research on IV NAD: Studies have shown that IV NAD infusion results in a swift and complete uptake of NAD by tissues, with significant utilization within the first two hours of administration.


Considerations: The choice between oral and IV NAD administration should consider factors such as the individual's health goals, preferences, and medical supervision. While oral supplements are more readily available, IV administration provides a more direct route for NAD delivery. It's important to note that regulations and availability of NAD precursors and IV therapy may vary by region and are subject to regulatory oversight. Therefore, consulting with a healthcare provider or NAD specialist is advisable to determine the most suitable approach based on individual needs and regulatory considerations. In summary, both oral and IV NAD administration have their merits, and the choice depends on factors including convenience, rapidity of effects, and regulatory considerations. Consulting with a healthcare provider can help individuals make an informed decision tailored to their specific circumstances and health goals.


15 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page